@webman2k: You and Hasteur below disagree on the usefulness of m.twitter.com . I'm thinking straight-up text is probably still the way to go on Kindle. Read more

@Hasteur: Noted. Read more

@dantheman12: Another "oldie" but goodie. Thanks! Read more

@Kyang: Thanks! Read more

@yarden: Well, take note that it's a shared account—nobody is really using it as their primary reader. We do, of course, interact and debate on our personal accounts. Read more

@HunterShoptaw: Any idea which two? Read more

@Melinda Serven: That's in Portland, right? [freegeek.org] Read more

@dep: Apologies, fixed now! Read more

@fisheradam: Boom! And it only took about 250 words :) Read more

@Arthur J Boilanger: Grazie. Grabbed it! Read more

@y0himba: Done and done. Read more

@Platypus Man: It's funny—Google disagrees with Jonathan Larson. I guess I'll go with the more common answer. Read more

@Dodge2002: Different strengths and weaknesses. At this point, the big weakness is that so many people are meta-data-tethered to their iTunes libraries. Read more

@knwldg: [lifehacker.com] Read more

@kyle.bellamy: Good to know. Thanks! Read more

@rogowar: With a smartphone, you can usually differentiate emails from SMS—ping for one, not the other. That's the solution I thought of for the problem you mention—but it's far from perfect. Read more

@Al Iguana: Bingo. Read more

@rogsim: Maybe I could kill the -oholic. But it's definitely on the right side of the bell curve ;) Read more

@Mickets: Thanks for the lesson! You've got your tag system down. Read more

@ripwind: Agreed on the IM client. Was hoping there'd be something there, but no luck. Read more