@drdoombot: Check out the list of supported sites here. (I also updated the link in the article to point to the more comprehensive project page.) Read more

@tom2133: Glad you caught that. ;) Read more

@Gina Trapani: Read more

@woundedwalrus: That's a sweet pic - where did you get it? Read more

@robotfroggie: Thanks for catching that! Read more

@theczardictates: You read the post, didn't you? (Hint: second paragraph, last sentence, in parentheses) Read more

All of Stephenie Meyer's books are on my Amazon Wishlist, and while I know it's available online, I'd rather have a paper copy to take with me wherever I go. I prefer to sometimes unplug, after all. :) Read more

@TruPhan: I think it's a lot more complicated than that. Gawker Media sites are all maintained internally by a lot of great folks who do some pretty awesome stuff behind the scenes. :) Read more

@Mecki: "What happens if it is not successful? Does this mean none of his future posts will ever be considered being an audition again in the future? Are his future posts actually ever read by a moderator again or does an unsuccessful audition equal a ban and all posts are discarded without any further review?" Read more

@Eric Crist: I'm speaking on behalf of the moderation team at Lifehacker. I actually can use "us" in that instance. ;) Read more

@Krondonian: w00t! Yes, you don't want to see the other stuff. ;) Read more

@Krondonian: Nope, that wasn't it. Again, the post was long overdue. A single event didn't prompt this post. Let's just say we get lots of emails and lots of erm, interesting comments that don't make their way onto the site. Read more

@PembrokeLumos: Inactivity, my friend. Our system did that awhile ago and that's why your account may have been inactive. Read more

@bradhart2: FWIW, it's over 2 years old. I think it may not be functioning properly as I'm encountering similar issues as well. Read more

Vote: FlashFXP Read more

@monkeyboy: It probably means that one of those items was completed, and the other one was half-done. ;) Read more

@Con Seannery: Have you ever tried it? "Small number of foil flakes" is an understatement :) Read more

@Juice Box Hero: Yeah, I feel their pain! But the text is customizable (so you could make it a lot smaller than the screenshot illustration). Read more

@earlthegoat: I didn't activate an Internet connection when I used it and it worked fine when I tried it. Read more

@Danj3ris: You wouldn't want to scratch through the label. You'd get plastic shards of pieces flying all over the place. Best results are achieved when you put this thing data-side-up and scratch across the data. I find it extremely hard to believe that someone would be able to rebuff the CD and read all the data… Read more